Conflicting legal interpretations of the bill are now more about whether military detentions would be mandatory or would the president still retain some discretion.

In sum, the wording appears to create a parallel military justice system that, theoretically, we are all subject to. All that would be needed is an allegation by someone that we assisted someone who in some way assisted someone else in some way. An actual terrorist act would not be needed – and neither would a trial by one’s peers as guaranteed by the Constitution to determine actual “guilt.”

Should you be tempted to dismiss this as “liberal fear-mongering,” take a look at this item from FoxNews.com with its gleeful headline: “Democrat-Controlled Senate Passes Constitution-Shredding Defense Authorization Bill”:

“The bill would require military custody of a suspect deemed to be a member of Al Qaeda or its affiliates and involved in plotting or committing attacks on the United States. … The legislation also would give the government the authority to have the military hold an individual suspected of terrorism indefinitely, without a trial.

If Fox news claims NDAA as a "constiution-shredding" Bill then the U.S. must have superseded the rank of a Police state

Fox news did criticized the NDAA as a "constituion-shredding" bill

-----------------------------

The U.S. has Superseded the rank of a Police state

What then of our sixth amendment right ?

what kind of precedent does this follow from and set for the future ?

Are our most fundamental understandings deeply flawed?

The Chinese logical philosopher Gongsun Long (ca. 325–250 BC) proposed the paradox "One and one cannot become two, since neither becomes two."


If one is added to one then the group one and one would contain two ones
each one of the ones their-selves do not achieve the state of being two
------------------------------
One and one cannot become two


Whether or not this argument is provable, overly simply, or a serious argument to consider the fundamental ways in which we quantify reality or begin to perceive the closest conceptions to fact and truth based on simple math, it proves to be to be an interesting assertion


what do you think?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic#cite_note-18

Protests praise the ways we stay Oppressed

... the capitalist class has at its disposal a state apparatus of organized violence— the cops, courts and prisons—to repress struggle against its domination. The liberal doctrine of “nonviolence” obscures the fact that the capitalists will stop at nothing to protect their profits.


[The ruling class uses] organized violence to repress struggle against its domination


------------------------------
Conformity to nonviolent ideology inhibits the understanding that the ruling class uses any means necessary (violence) to protect its interests.




http://www.icl-fi.org/english/wv/989/let-occupy.html

Adoption to Abort Abortions

1. Adoption is a viable alternative to abortion and accomplishes the same result. And with 1.5 million American families wanting to adopt a child, there is no such thing as an unwanted child
   
   
   [Americans Can't get enough kids to adopt]
   There is no such thing as an unwanted child
   -------------------------------------
   Adoption is a Viable alternative to abortion and accomplishes the same result 
   
   
   I sense there are fallacies being committed here, What do you guys think?
   
   

Serving the Citizens

Barack Obama, who came into office with avid support from the pro-capitalist labor bureaucracy and among the reformist left, pledged to carry out the “global war on terror” with greater effectiveness than the widely reviled Republican Bush administration. While drawing down U.S. forces in Iraq, Obama has escalated the occupation of Afghanistan and massively expanded drone attacks, slaughtering villagers from Pakistan to Yemen and Somalia. The assassination of Osama bin Laden by Navy SEAL commandos in Pakistan in May was an act of imperialist arrogance typical of the U.S. “cops of the world.” Now, by assassinating al-Awlaki, the Obama administration has declared in effect that a U.S. citizen designated a terrorist can be summarily executed: no legal charges, no trial.




Obama appears to be reducing military occupation yet expands it greatly
U.S. acts as World Police fighting "terror". 
U.S. assassination of U.S. citizen sets the precedent that citizens declared terrorists ( outside of the judiciary) can be arbitrarily assassinated. 
---------------------------------------------
Obama exacerbates the war on terror's ability to self perpetuate.

The reality of lethal legality

The killing of Troy Davis was racist legal lynching! In place of hooded KKK nightriders were pin-striped prosecutors and black-robed judges, along with the Board of Pardons and Paroles, which turned down Davis’s bid for clemency the day before the execution. In place of the lynch rope were needles dispensing the life-ending chemical cocktail. The substantial evidence of Davis’s innocence meant nothing. A white uniformed enforcer of capitalist law and order had been killed, and this black life had to be taken in return. Here is a stark demonstration of the workings of the capitalist state—an instrument of organized violence to protect the class rule and profits of the tiny handful of capitalists against the workers and the oppressed. The death penalty is the ultimate sanction of a “justice” system that is not only stacked against workers and the poor but also, in this society founded on slavery and maintained on a bedrock of black oppression, racist to its core.




P  Legal professionals are responsoble for biased killings
P2 Instead of lynching the state authorizes killings Intravenously 
P3 Substantial evidence proving Davis' innocence meant nothing
P4 An enforcer of oppression had been killed, in retaliation an oppressed person was killed.
P5 The capitalist state is an instrument of organized violence designed to perpetuate severe inequalities
---------------------------
C In society where oppression is based on status, wealth, and ethnicity, the death penalty is the ultimate exemplification of such oppression, where the common notion of "justice" is distorted by state sanctioned murdered of the oppressed.

Special Statistics

"In the case of this law, our students do not have anything to fear," Casey Wardynski said in halting Spanish. He urged families to send students to class and explained that the state is only trying to compile statistics

.

P The state is only trying to compile statistics
C Our students have nothing to fear




New anti immigration law incites skepticism. 


what do you think of the argument? 


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/10/01/reports-hispanic-students-vanishing-from-alabama-schools-after-immigration/